26-07-2005, 05:24 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
| Emeritus Mod
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,875 | Dangit, I meant teraflops, not terabytes (maybe next generation console, eh?). And yes, that is why I said that the supposed 2.18 teraflops were not necessary. Thanks for your breakdown, although could you explain a little more on the loss of teraflops for the two systems. Seems like you need to make a thread about this. We'll stick it to PS3 on multiple levels: teraflops, bandwidth, HD drive, etc...
Information is power. |
| |