[Boogie Woogie]

Originally Posted by ChaosLord13

I do agree that they don't suck they will be good competition but i fell that the 360 will do better than the rest of them, but i mean nintendo? k, i've never seen a company bomb as much as they have! they have NES and people love it, SNES again amazing, then N64 and it loses to the PS, a newcomer's first try, and then the Gamecube which loses again to a newcomer the Xbox, I mean they don't think they need DVD players, online, or anything like that and yet there are very few good games on it. Now with the Revolution, Gamecube's got basically one more good game, The Legend of Zelda , then it's a long wait till 06 or 07 for Nintendo fanboys for the next system. And that whole controller thing of course it's gonna be cool, got's gotta be able to play like every old controller they've ever come out with, but you a system not that great when their big hype is over a controller.... a controller! They are for controlling games, but if the games suck, there's not much to do. I'm sorry but if i really wanna play NES games just bring out the system or buy a new one for like 10 cents or i could wait for a vew more years and dish out like 400 bucks for a new system to play my old games. It just doesn't make sense to me!

The topic heading is "Why PS3 and Revolution will suck compared to the Xbox 360 . Then you don't give a valid reason for why Sony or Nintendo will "suck" compared to Xbox 360 . Then you say they won't suck ? I'm confused

You can't just dimiss the competition if you know nothing about them . No one knows anything about both the Revolution or PS3 and as someone else stated the Revolution controller could be the best thing since sliced bread , fact is we just don't know anything about it so to dismiss the Revolution is just plain silly and the same goes for PS3 .

We need to see more of what the competition has to offer .