| ||||||||||||||||
 | ||||||||||||||||
|
The Planet Xbox 360 Forums are dedicated to the discussion of anything Xbox 360 related. In order to start posting all you need to do is register. It's fast, simple, free, and will enable you to make forum posts, upload attachments, vote in polls, play the arcade games and a whole lot more. So please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
| |||||||
  |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-10-2007, 07:48 PM
| #21 (permalink) |
| Blue Army Supporter   Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,729    |  if this game was multi it would remind me of timesplitters
__________________  "Purple Haze all in my brain, baby things don't seem the same, not that funny, but I don't know why...Excuse me while I kiss the sky.." |
|  |
|
09-01-2008, 04:02 PM
| #22 (permalink) |
| Xbox 360 Member  Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 34  | I would like to add that the assumption that multiplayer means "re-playability" is extremely false. Quality = re-playability Someone who does not have xbox live would say halo 3 sucks, the campaign is nothing special. I understand X-box live is a fantastic service and a few games that would normally be rentals can be worth so much more cause of it. That does not mean its a standard of video gaming. Give Bioshock credit for putting their focus in the right areas.... the areas its competition (halo,COD) wasn't. and they succeeded with that formula cause the game is amazing. Its an experience that rivals the joys of any online experience. And they put enough effort and creativity into the game to make it worth playing more than once, or at least make it seem to be worth spending 60$s It seems like a bad video game strategy to put multiplayer into something just cause people think you should. |
|
| |
| |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:44 PM. 