New COD3 Info

Glock 19 · 07-03-2006, 12:22 PM

Here is article on new call of duty project.

LINK: http://www.joystiq.com/2006/03/07/ne...es-terrorists/

Don_Rico · 07-03-2006, 12:33 PM

Nice find.

gaz_berotten · 07-03-2006, 12:50 PM

Add on pack for COD2 really they wont of changed much from COD2 unless they use a new graphics engine which is doubhtfull since they will want to hype up the game so people will buy it.

Cougar50 · 07-03-2006, 12:58 PM

I will probally get the modern combat COD but I really don't feel like playing another WWII shooter so I probaly wont get the WWII one.

gaz_berotten · 07-03-2006, 01:22 PM

If the makers of the Call Of Duty series hired some mods and had them remake new levels then yeah ok the Third game will do great. Ive seen what modders of games can do and they make games look much much better and you feel better for trying something new.

Gamerkid360 · 07-03-2006, 01:48 PM

Why don't they go through history and do like vietnam and the cold war and modern combat where we Get to blow Osamas head off and stuff!!

gaz_berotten · 07-03-2006, 03:30 PM

Better yet they could let people build their own battles, missions and vehicles etc it would make the game more interesting with the hard drive an all

Grindstone · 07-03-2006, 05:56 PM

I read this earlier today as well. Not sure what to think: another WW2 mod. Hmm, could be worse.

Shotty · 07-03-2006, 06:27 PM

The developers need to lay off the WW2 games for a while. There should be a call of duty where you get to play all aspects of teh war. Such as everthing on COD 2 plus pearl harbour. Plus get to drive vehicles such as tanks and armored jeeps. Even the A-bomb dropped on nagasaki would be cook but I doubt they will do that since the japanese are alreadly weary of the 360. Would be pretty cook thou. I want a mario party kind of game for the 360 not mario exactly but with a whole buch of minigames that me and a bunch of friends can play at a party. That way they can also get some of the revolutions audience as well.

Big_P · 08-03-2006, 09:14 AM

every1 can find good stuuf but me

KamiKaziKlown · 08-03-2006, 09:20 AM

i like your thinking shotty but no one ever listens to the people unless they have a lot of money or name recognition about games

Myaxmatosis 803 · 08-03-2006, 10:30 AM

I want, I want, I want.. That's all I ever hear out of gamers. Unless you have a degree in game development; or some serious money and pull in the video game industry..

I'm personally sick of war games in general. Why can't they make a game based on the battle of Gettysburg? How about a overall Civil or Revolutionary based game? The greatest wars ever, yet for some reason always ignored. How about a World War 1 game? Hmm? A game that actually takes an ounce of skill to beat, or one were the A.I. actually adapts to you, how about one where it actually tosses you in the thicket.

Why not those, huh? Why not? What's wrong with fighting as the Confederate Army, the greatest army of all time, despite the lost were much better then the Union. That I can garuntee; but am not going to go into an arguement about that. How about playing as the Swamp Monster from the Rev. War? Where we would hide in the swamp and the French would walk by thinking no one's crazy enough to be in there and out we'd pop and completely masacre them opposition.

How about a game, that I won't beat in a matter of days? I beat Halo 2 on Legendary in 6 1/2 hours. I beat GTA: Vice City in one full 24 hr day. I beat CoD2 on Veteran, non-stop in about 7 hours. I want a game that makes me wanna rip my head off my shoulders and kick a field goal with it, damnit.

Blank · 08-03-2006, 11:10 AM

After playing the brilliance of COD2, I cannot wait for these new titles. However, the 'Modern Combat' one should drop the COD name in my opinion.

Still, should be interesting...

Myaxmatosis 803 · 08-03-2006, 11:21 AM

Call of Duty: The Battle at Gettysburg .. I'm telling you, would be the best of the series IF they knew what the hell they were doing.

Gamerkid360 · 08-03-2006, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Myaxmatosis 803

Call of Duty: The Battle at Gettysburg .. I'm telling you, would be the best of the series IF they knew what the hell they were doing.

CrazyForceBoy · 17-04-2006, 03:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gamerkid360

CrazyForceBoy · 17-04-2006, 04:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyForceBoy

sorry about the double post got a little retarded and coudnt delete it

Mad Monkey360 · 17-04-2006, 05:21 AM

^It called an Edit button.

Gamerkid360 · 17-04-2006, 12:21 PM

Why not those, huh? Why not? What's wrong with fighting as the Confederate Army, the greatest army of all time, despite the lost were much better then the Union. That I can garuntee; but am not going to go into an arguement about that.

The confederates? The greatest Army of all time?! Yeah right. They lost and thats a good thing. ever wonder why they lost? Maybe they werent better than the Union, ever think of that? How can you guarantee that the confederates were better. The confererates wanted the country to be devided in to 2 sectors North and south and the brilliant union wanted us to stay together.

I used to like the confederates when I was 7 because I liked there flag more than the us!! But when you understand the history you sound like an Arrogant a$$ who thinks he knows everything!!

General Tso · 17-04-2006, 01:20 PM

Coming from a person who studies the subject, the Confederate Army was just as capable as the Union's. The problem was manpower and the North produced 90% of the nations industrial capacity. The North had 11 times as many ships and boats as the the South. The North produced 17 times as much textile goods, 24 times as many trains and 32 times as many fire arms. Lastly and most importantly the North's food production was 2 to 1 compared to the South's production.

The men fighting on both sides were the same. The Confederates were fighting a war they could never win because of the Union's sheer dominance in industry but that does not mean the men of the Confederacy were not capable of being a force. They did drag the war on for 4 years after all.